THE 4 MILLION OUNCE BET, page-7820

I don’t know but people are really ….

the granting of the MR was based on the scorecard or points that the applicant needs to tick as explained well in the charter along with the various laws and policies cited within the charter. Within the timeline, one can object against the merit of the application, and due to the covid delay, this even was extended. Now since no objections was sustained (remember this part) the MR MUST be granted per law. Remember the word as kwell MUST.

now the appeal that was lodged and announced yesterday was a recycled one that DMRE has dismissed already and dismissed again by the DEFF. nothing sustained on all objections and appeals. Meaning we scored a pass for all the requirements

now per the timeline, why is this important. The appeal lodged recently and announced yesterday was the same objection to the MR and the same one for the EA grant appeals. Meaning the same junked arguments has passed through 2x scrutiny already.

so you mean, one can appeal to an appeal to an appeal to an appeal. Wow. timeline is important, the Mining right was granted 19th of July. Appeals to an administrative decision can only be lodged within 30 days. Now, as I have stated above, the appeal was recycled and junked 2x now, officially. Why would the minister grant and waste time to extend appeals deadline when the appeal contents are the same one junked by Himself and another minister.

about the contents of the appeal, one is saying our legal team doesn’t know the contents or details. Damn! The law specifically states, affected parties needs to know all the details of any objections or appeals. This is a requirement. Thus we know for sure per Hulme that the contents are RECYCLED.

and remember, scorecards (this is very important) scorecards, please research this, why they have put in scorecards

again research the scorecards