Ok. I get what you mean.
Although unless they are contractually obligated to do so (is this part of the hedging arrangement?), I don't see much reason for them to sell the 55% unhedged at below cost, just because they've covered those costs in the 45%. They would just be depleting their reserve for no real benefit.
FEX Valuation, page-434
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 365 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FEX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
39.5¢ |
Change
0.010(2.60%) |
Mkt cap ! $274.3M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 38.5¢ | 39.5¢ | 38.0¢ | $607.3K | 1.561M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 69556 | 39.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 39.5¢ | 38158 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FEX (ASX) Chart |