Paul was taught by Greek philosophers and disagreed with Peter, who being a disciple of Jesus, should presumably have understood Jesus better than Paul. Not to mention numerous other problems such as Paul being unaware of aspects of Jesus that are in the later written gospels.
---------------------
Dbt, you need to check your source material. Here is what Paul revealed about himself and testified before the Jewish high court:
(Acts 23:6) Now Paul, knowing that the one part was made up of Sadducees but the other of Pharisees, cried out in the Sanʹhe·drin: “Men, brothers, I am a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees. Over the hope of the resurrection of the dead I am being judged.”
These were facts that could be checked at the temple where records were kept.
(Philippians 3:5) circumcised the eighth day, of the nation of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew born from Hebrews; regarding law, a Pharisee;
His instructor was the renowned Pharisee, Gamaliel.
(Acts 22:3) “I am a Jew, born in Tarsus of Ci·liʹcia, but educated in this city at the feet of Ga·maʹli·el, instructed according to the strictness of the ancestral Law, and zealous for God just as all of you are this day.
The apostle Peter had the greatest affection and respect for Paul and his teachings.
(2 Peter 3:15, 16) Furthermore, consider the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote you according to the wisdom given him, speaking about these things as he does in all his letters. However, some things in them are hard to understand, and these things the ignorant and unstable are twisting, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction.
Peter said it was the ''ignorant and unstable'' that disagreed with what Paul taught.
Maybe you misunderstood. It was actually Paul that taught the Greek philosophers.
Expand
