General discussion, page-1263

  1. 4,132 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 12973
    1) Probably best to stick to the stock and not myself and my followers.

    2) You're tonnage figures are incorrect. Given the leapfrog model figures are volumetric in nature you need to convert them to tonnes by appropriate method. i.e. multiple by specific gravity. I would recommend 1.8. Thus you should arrive at a total tonnage of 150mT+. Noting the MRE upgrades will likely increase this figure. Admittedly not substantially.

    3) Agree leapfrog modelling typically better for in pit modelling. Note leapfrog modelling is not MRE compliant thus is a better representation as to how reserves are compiled from resources.

    Noting that the MRE has over 200mT at KM alone at 7.5% HM grade.
    MRQ 11.PNG
    4) Toliara does not have 9.4% HM. Its DFS models that grade figure for 2-4.5years. Also worth noting that it omits grades from Y0-Y2. The MRQ advantage of mining economical grades to get to the high grade zonation as opposed to it being genuine waste or 'top soil stripping'.

    For context to reading toliara hm grade drops below 5.4% after 15Y. Noting MRQ has over 1200Mt at that grade at KM alone.

    5) We obviously have opinion about 'low grade' overburden. See below.

    MRQ at surface.PNG


    6) Toliara gets around 94-95% recovery, so i'm assuming less. Strandline also gets around 96% on a much poorer grade HM using LTR. So yes acknowledge slimes are larger but at 5-6 times more HM per tonne in the feed they're already processing less waste material. You think 90% isn't achievable, I think (come production) that's around where they will be.

    7) I'm not incorporating titanomagnetite into the economics. And am treating the economics as ilmenite play with some credit in the zircon

    8) They will need to raise cash at some point I do agree. IMV will be post MRE upgrades but pre SS. The SS will be the carrot dangle to have cash raised and IMV that's where the opportunity lies.

    RvR for me, if the company was 60M AUD i'd be more inclined to be bearish or neutral in nature. But i do think a SS with around 250M AUD is possible. Anything less than 10% MC/NPV ratio usually warrants an investment from me and then i'll see how it develops and free-carry the initial capital.

    1% of commodity stocks make it to mining. I think MRQ has a chance to make it. (better than 1% atleast) and that's generally how I target my investment. But that doesn't mean there's not an opportunity to make money on the 99% percent that don't. Just need to get the timing right.

    SS will be the decision point as to whether I exit or free-carry. Up until that point unless we move to 40-50M AUD MC I don't intend to be doing any selling. I indicate my target MC ahead of time, so if anyone wants to suggest a pump i'll refer people back to posts of initial targets and sell points.

    SF2TH
    Last edited by setfire2thehive: 05/10/21
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
0.4¢
Change
0.000(0.00%)
Mkt cap ! $10.90M
Open High Low Value Volume
0.4¢ 0.4¢ 0.4¢ $1.175K 300.0K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
17 22257289 0.3¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
0.4¢ 8902127 19
View Market Depth
Last trade - 15.45pm 14/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
MRQ (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.