General Discussion, page-1342

Good Morning Spid. I find it bordering on mismanagement for the company to not give a detailed operational program on this “development ready “ project.
This leads me to believe it is intentional. Is it a coincidence that the SP went vertical just prior to a CR with continuous information leading up to this? Is it a coincidence that shortens came on the scene almost immediately after CR with no fear? This development ready project was never ready to develop. It was ready to design. We just needed funding to progress this. Having said this I personally believe we are very close to being development ready NOW.
This known delay was always in the picture for our CR investors and a 12 month delay is nothing to them and in fact played into their hands to accumulate more stock. I refuse to believe that Andrew has got to this stage in the developments timeframe from being a complete idiot. He just isn’t feeding our need for accurate and frequent updates on our progress because it does not suit his agenda YET. IMO.
All That being said, it’s now imperative that the company lays out its building program moving forward and give shareholders some certainty on the timeframes ahead.
I wonder how development ready is Epanko. How much design and permitting is require d once the finance structure is agreed upon? No Uni , I am not a comrade but some honest non hyped up responses would be refreshing at this point. I am on your side in believing in this company but am pissed at the amount of speculation required by investors into a company that is trying to no longer be speculative. Only way to reverse this is to take away all speculation and give some definitive information.