You don't do your research. This waiver has been discussed on HotCopper for months. It relates solely to the exploitation of uranium, which is a by-product for GGG.
It was never anticipated that GGG were spending loads of cash getting ready to exploit the REEs, but all of a sudden face a change of policy in Greenland that would prevent them exploiting REEs, just because they would be disturbing low-levels of uranium and safely storing it with the tailings - but not exploiting it.
Nobody welcomes a legal sh*t fight, but GGG could well take legal action for damages. Who would pay them if GGG won? Would it have to come out of the Danish subsidy paid to Greenland?
Draft Proposal for near zero tolerance, page-76
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.3¢ |
Change
-0.002(6.12%) |
Mkt cap ! $32.30M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.4¢ | 2.5¢ | 2.3¢ | $36.53K | 1.543M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 151510 | 2.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5¢ | 252330 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ETM (ASX) Chart |