We are coming at this from two very different angles, and it is exhausting. You are fixated on academic issues i.e. difference between IP, patent, trademark etc. I am focused on the value proposition in an acquistion/sale scenario.
It completely misses the point that I raised when @vfpa5000000 was saying that Team17 might seek to acquire PLY at a 50-100% premium when I questioned why pay such a premium for a company that does not own anything particularly valuable?
Please try to stay at least two steps behind.
Ann: PlaySide & Team17 sign Long-Term Publishing Agreement, page-46
Add PLY (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
58.0¢ |
Change
-0.010(1.69%) |
Mkt cap ! $237.3M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 61.0¢ | 61.0¢ | 57.0¢ | $165.5K | 286.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1100 | 57.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 61.0¢ | 47605 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 03/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PLY (ASX) Chart |