Most Medical Doctors I speak to including my wife say no to Nanose as a primary Covid detection device test. The simple logistical problem of having to breathe into something to detect a respiratory transmitted disease is a contraindication.
The question of whether it works or not is irrelevant to them. They basically dismiss the idea very quickly.
The technology is good, but the use case for Covid, maybe not.
If it was that good and economical, it would be in development as an IP customer of BRN by now.
IMO
2021 BRN Discussion, page-26732
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6,849 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
20.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $371.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 19.5¢ | 20.5¢ | 19.5¢ | $656.1K | 3.281M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | 364081 | 20.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 20.5¢ | 1348618 | 18 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRN (ASX) Chart |