General Discussion Topics, page-26921

@Phoenixx

With respect - My post's today on Hydrogen were totally relevant as well as factual in so far as they relate to Sayona ....and investing in Sayona more generally.

If you cannot see the relevance in those posts , then I'm afraid I cannot help you any further with you investment strategies which you yourself I believe have been stated to be novice.

HC motives can be very subtle in my opinion at times , however I watched the entire weekend by sitting back observing how ONE single question ( which I purposefully did not answer until I could postulate what might have been the relevance to it ) ....and which took the entire foprum completely off-topic and totally irrelevant unless you can draw a sufficient investing thesis as to why this technology would be a better investment than Sayona.

And I believe I unpacked that argument today in a more relevant and precise way in so far as where that Technology really means in relation to Lithium, and why perhaps others like Trevor St Baker and his fund are NOT pursuing those Investments more rigorously.

I thought I was BOTH fair , balanced , and more measured than that some of the more Off-topic discussions which dominated the Threads in what I could only see as more a ' subtle negative ' towards Sayona and a Plug and Ramp on others. Remember that part of the game which I don not participate in is to deflect and steer Investors away from one and onto another.

For what its worth , I also saw the return of the SOI comments as also having an overtone of more negative. But I have spoken my piece on that one and will not be covering that or bringing up my previous comments again. I had not commented on the Hydrogen discussion and so again wanted to put that to bed in terms of what I perceived was being made of it. And I make no apologies for my posts as I believe you should take that discussion over to the stock which you obviously hold in that area of decarbonization technology developments.

But at the end of the day , I am not here to make you understand my posts and / or why I have chosen to use certain relevant materials to make my point. That's up to you to do. However clearly you have chosen to see the comparisons to ' Growth ' and what markets may or may not become available , or where money is likely to be made or not is no value to you. Personally , I don't really care to be honest. I just didn't like how every single topic over the weekend had been dealt with and / or was ' subtly ' negative and off topic. As far as I am concerned , I made it more ' on topic ' from a real practical investing point of view. You know.....like follow the money from the likes of Trevor St. Baker & Co. .....and not necessarily the one which you can directly invest in which is what you've been peddling as ' Twiggy's ' recent move.

So I reckon that observation is completely relevant. Even the ' Horse ' comment via its name was relevant as well as a bit of fun because it relates directly to the word used by Pilbara's Ken Brinsden in a specific Lithium Industry interview. I suppose you would alternatively think it was O.K to quote Twiggy Forest any chance you could as well. So horses for courses I say.