All should be good if the top of the cement in the annulus is above the top of the main Kingia reservoir .
The set cement stops any further formation damage from the drilling fluid .
However if the top of the cement is below the Kingia then formation damage could be occurring .
To keep the well safe they will be topping up the annulus as mud filtrate moves into any open permeable zones and the mud filter cake thickens .
There is no chance to do a wiper trip to condition the hole before the remedial cement job so the cement job may not be optimal .
However if the Kingia is already protected by cement it may not matter much .
STX say the reason the flow rate test on WE5 was less than it should have been was because of formation damage .
They said they had a skin effect and blamed it on a cementing problem .
The remedial cement job will not be a squeeze .They make a hole in the casing at the level of the top of the cement in the annulus and more or less do a normal cement job .
The annulus will be open not closed .
The mechanical problem that caused this mess is not common and really does not have a lot to do with it being a deep hole .
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NWE
- Ann: Lockyer Deep-1 Operational Update
Ann: Lockyer Deep-1 Operational Update, page-42
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 156 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NWE (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online