This nonsensical construct of holders v non holders is absurd. The other nonsensical construct that seems to shape the debate from time to time is the, "... ring the company and ask them" line. Can investors not rely upon the information distributed via the ASX? I have read most Annual Reports and I have never read in those documents an invitation to call anyone.
I have noted on many occasions that I wish for the best for CGB holders - I would dearly love to see the SP rise to 5c or 10c so that all of the mum and dad, retail investors get their dollars back and with some extra in their hand. Holding a contrarian point of view does not mean that one hopes for the worst for holders. If there's a contrarian or any other poster who wants to see people lose money then I think that they deserve to be strongly rebuked by all posters.
"... whats it going to take for you to get of CGB's back and move on somewhere and some place else?" (sic)
Simply, it's a free world and this is a public forum. You should put me on ignore if you find my posts "tiresome". "Vengeful" was too strong in my view.
I have consistently held the view that investors are in a better position to make decisions if they have access to the facts, have an open discuss on the facts and apply a fair and reasonable analysis to the facts.
