Ok, that makes sense. Probably error where Mark mixed stats for build's 4 and 5.
I think the SBE quoted in build 4 is incorrectly stated. If these used a bigger brick it would have been a key feature identified.
What I am interested trying to assess what I'd like to phrase "Total Available Operational Hrs" on site.
Lay rates are great and interesting when assessing potential, but when commercialised, its about getting to site, getting the job done and then leaving site.
So I am trying to assess the overall trend concerning lay rates relating to the entire deploy period.
Perhaps another way to describe it, I am trying to assess the the trend of overall consistency (or reliability) rather than what is the quickest lay rate recorded or "how long it took to build walls when it was actually on site and working".
The following table is my current workings, that I'm happy to people, to verify, question, make suggestions etc
The items marked yellow are those estimated by me, that either contradict what has been reported, or I have tried to assess
Dayton Commercial Day Care Wellard 1 Wellard 2 1 Build 1 Build 2 Build 3 Build 4 Build 5 2 3 Bricks Laid 2,991 4,413 8,670 3,456 4,343 4 5 Stand Brick Equivalent 13,759 20,300 36,500 15,898 19,978 6 7 SBE to Brick Laid Conversion 4.60 4.60 4.21 4.60 4.60 8 9 10 Build Days / Time on Site 6 16 4.5 11 12 Total Build Hrs (8) 42 48 128 36 36 13 14 Lay Rate per Hr 71.21 91.94 67.73 96.00 120.64 15 SBE Rate Per Hr 327.60 422.92 285.16 441.61 554.94
Whilst we are still in testing phase (yes even with 5 builds, we a re still testing) and subject to further analysis and scrutiny of my numbers , it seems that apart from the Child care centre, there has been a pleasing trend in improvement in lay rates, once you "normalise" the builds back to "start when truck arrives and finish when truck leaves".
Re my comments in Yellow
Build 2 - assessed from FBRocks table 6 days (excluding Sat and Sun) and estimating 8 hrs days
Build 4 - I still contend the 21,780 SBE is incorrect. They have been using the same brick and so 15,898 is the more accurate number.
Build 5 - video say 29 laying hrs. Applied the same approach as Build 4 (also 29 lay hrs) and truck on site for 4 1/2 days
Plugging the above (assuming they are correct) into a model that tries to assess site profit based on today's brick lay rates ( I have heard as high a $3.00) and my estimated daily costs, my current draft model shows the following:
Dayton Commercial Day Care Wellard 1 Wellard 2 1 Build 1 Build 2 Build 3 Build 4 Build 5 2 Revenue - ( $2.00 x SBE) $27,518 $40,600 $73,000 $31,796 $39,956 3 4 Op Costs - ($4,500 x Days) $23,625 $27,000 $72,000 $20,250 $20,250 5 6 Site Profit $3,893 $13,600 $1,000 $11,546 $19,706
There are a few elements not factored in the above could impact on the numbers, but based on what I have been able to assess I'm reasonably happy with overall improvement of the X in terms of both speed and reliability.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- FBR
- All builds to date
All builds to date, page-91
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add FBR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
4.6¢ |
Change
0.001(2.22%) |
Mkt cap ! $221.9M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
4.6¢ | 4.9¢ | 4.5¢ | $387.1K | 8.299M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 315279 | 4.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.7¢ | 221109 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 315279 | 0.046 |
15 | 852119 | 0.045 |
6 | 638488 | 0.044 |
7 | 551192 | 0.043 |
8 | 942829 | 0.042 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.047 | 210477 | 1 |
0.048 | 63340 | 1 |
0.049 | 752000 | 4 |
0.050 | 884463 | 4 |
0.051 | 371342 | 5 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
FBR (ASX) Chart |