Chips physical size, page-9

Hi @uiux
Just thinking about this comparison and the following facts:

1. In 2013 Professor Haick, NaNose, Siemens, Seimens Medical and a number of European companies came together for the sole purpose of developing a hand held device to detect disease from VOC’s found in human breath. Covid was not a target disease hen they started.

2. They failed as they could not find a processor to interpret the data produced by the NaNose sensors on device.

3. In 2020 they discovered AKIDA technology and leaving aside whether a commercial device has yet been approved AKD1000 was able to process this data completely on chip without connection.

Now the absolutely stunning fact is this processing by AKD1000 which is not as large as a ten cent piece was achieved using only FIVE PERCENT of its neural fabric and produced state of the art performance outstripping the PCR standard of care test which runs to around 90% accuracy and costs depending what country you are in about $100 to perform. It was stated by Professor Haick that utilising AKIDA the NaNose test would cost $2.00 to $3.00.

It is very hard to wrap ones head around the processing power of this tiny little chip.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA

PS: Think about this AKD1000 is scalable down to 14nm, 7nm and 4nm based on information from the company and in so doing power consumption goes down even further and processing speed increases.