CAD Chart, page-443

The first matter worthy of consideration is the realistic expectation of what these results are capable of revealing.

197 AC holes to a toal combined depth of 1599 metres. This gives and average hole of circa 81 metres depth.

Look at DEG. The mineralisation is not at surface, nor is it close to surface.

This AC drilling is simply scouting and may provide some good grades, but based upon DEG, many holes are not deep enough to find any mineralistaion. Many, including me, have talked about the nearology. Its not a valid contention to say the minerlisation may be shallower when, on the same hand, arguing nearology based upon the same geology.

Many here have correctly identified significant delays in essaying. Who, on here, will profer a contention that the these inexcess of 5000 samples will be assessed in three weeks. We have learnt that these very samples were received, yet after some several weeks, they remained in bags, untouched.

I read here that there is some tending to "idolising false god".

Without wanting to take @BeerAndSkittles comments out of context, my interpretation of his wise and salient advice is to "listen to what they say, but watch very closely what they do".

I have mentioned the import of Mt.B.




This graphic clealry illustrates the shears and anticlines. The trend is without doubt, S/W to N/E. Regional exploration will verify this, as who, amongst you, can identify another explorer in the region who has drilled up any reults that approximate DEG's.

My issue is simply, what is happening to this tenement?

Its been sometime since Mosig came on board. Mt.B. is mentioned and even identified as being granted.

The Mt.B. tenement is still pending after 4 years.

Forget about other tenements. CAD is RH and Mt.B.

I have been following, in and out, for over 12 months.

Any reasonable assessment should not be mocked by shouts, "why dont you sell". That is purile.

I dont wish to be rude, but I dont see a great deal of considered and well researched opinion.

Our enthuisiasm needs to be sobered by some realism.

My apprehension is, the essays will not be ready within the indicated timeframes. The resulst may be indiciative only and not stellar. Mt.B. is an unkown and CAD has not given a clear understanding of the status of the pending application.

Lastly, the result delay information was leaked. No doubt.