Ann: Significant Cash Receipt and Updates on Guidance and Funding, page-143

I don't see the export potential for C4Edge compared to any other company producing similar capability. At best they can hope for a period of being the local provider of one portion of the Australian Army's Land C4I solution but there is no real export opportunity unless the following can be satisfied:

1, they have to find another nation that is not doing the same from domestic SMEs. Most nations already have their own domestic capability they want to foster just like investors in EOS will the Australian government to do. So they will just be another overseas 'Prime', same as the ones they are using 'sovereign' to market against, in another country.
2, their capability MUST end up being markedly better than the established providers of similar networked systems or they're just another company selling an option with no compelling . EOS continue to show they do not have a core product (RWS) that can upset the global primes (like Kongsberg) or others like FN, Rafael, Elbit, Aselsan etc. There is no evidence they can reverse this trend with C4Edge.

We also need to consider what being a 'Prime' for EOS means. In C4Edge, it looks like they're just being the program manager. From what can be gleaned from their releases, all the capability is coming from all the other companies. At best EOS is just clipping the ticket on the way through and adding a management overhead. Lots of local companies in the Australian defence sector can do that. 'Primes' do a lot more than that. By their own release EOS have only done one single response to an AUSDEFCON - ONE!
Commonwealth Contract Negotiations Complete | EOS | Electro Optic Systems (eos-aus.com)

Ben Greene is correct - EOS is a start-up. Problem is they've been a start-up since 1983. At the same time he also says they're an Australian Prime.