General Discussion Topics, page-29719

Different group at Tansim than at Authier.

That being said I have been here long enough that history is repeating itself.

1. group complains and says bla bla bla
2. community engagement occurs
3. group becomes share holders
4. no longer an issue

Yes I am talking about what occurred at Authier. Now at Tansim we are at step 1 again.

The above 4 steps can be applied to many other groups for instance PLL is on step 2 from above.

I get that no one wants change, this is human nature, we all suffer from this. I think Sayona will endeavor to help make things right when there is change involved.

From the standpoint of the indigenous people they would have to be fairly conflicted about this project. On the one hand the landscape they have been accustomed to will be changing and potentially could change some of their hunting / fishing areas. On the other the project itself is geared to fix the climate without these type projects more of the landscape will change and the loss of a few acres of hunting / fishing could turn into a compete loss. Sayona absolutely needs to do everything in their power to protect the environment and put things back the way they were when the project is completed. This is the responsible thing to do.