Point 1: Hawaii: Morrison publicly corrected the statement in parliament under parliament oath. Irrespective, is the location of his holiday relevant. Or are Labor using a specious argument to sling mud, consider Albanese was advised he would be on holiday? Remember, dont re-write history here. The issue people had was he was on holidays, during a fire season. Something you, yourself have bought up. Not where he chose to holiday.
Point 2: This isnt a well developed point, seems like a lot of conjecture. I would need more specifics before commenting.
Point 3: This is a policy shift. Pretty silly to suggest shifting policy intent is a lie. I think this should be congratulated. In terms of the specifics, there is currently not EV available in Australia that would replace the Toyota Landcruiser style vehicle that can tow a 3T caravan for 600-800km on a single tank. This isnt to say there wont be in the future. But currently there isnt. So an immediate transition to EV's would result in that form of recreation ending.
Point 4: I don't know the specifics of this one. Not really interested either. Sam Dastyari is a slime ball...
Point 5: This is political conjecture. Just because the government files their own high court intervention, doesnt automatically imply conspiration with Palmer. That is simply cheap politicking because ALP are worried about UAP influence over the election, and are trying to force the LNP to reject their preferences..
Point 6-8? This is one persons word against another's, without evidence to support each others claims. Your bias leads you to side with Macron, who himself has been referred to as a serial liar. So again, not really much to comment on. Other then I will say it was the right move to exit the french deal and strategically align with our closest partners through AUKUS
Point 10: There's nothing here? Its just an opinion that he has lied without providing evidence of an irrevocable lie? If they could provide the specific lie with specific evidence of it being a lie, I could comment on it. But its just opinion that the writer thinks he has lied, so he's lying about lying... That's a one man feedback loop
