New Anti-Troll Laws Welcomed By [Redacted By Legal] Who [Redacted By Legal] The PhilippinesNew Anti-Troll Laws Welcomed By [Redacted By Legal] Who [Redacted By Legal] The Philippines — The Betoota Advocate
A swathe of anti-troll laws are set to enter Federal Parliament this week which are aimed at unmasking people who say shocking and defamatory things online about [redacted by legal] and especially [redacted by legal] but not limited to [redacted by legal], [redacted by legal], [redacted by legal] and the 1999 NRL Grand Final debacle.
One [redacted by legal] who has welcomed the new laws is [redacted by legal], who has been facing a large amount of scrutiny of [redacted by legal] and their apparent disregard from the democratic [redacted by legal] and transparency.
In particular, [redacted by legal].
As one of Australia’s closest regional trading partners, The Philippines plays a pivotal role in Australia’s recovery from the pandemic recession.
It’s something that needs to be considered when addressing [redacted by legal] and the manner in which the democratic process is being largely [redacted by legal] – which goes against the age-old adage that’s spoonfed to concerned citizens – if you have nothing to [redacted by legal], then you have nothing to [redacted by legal].
The new anti-troll laws are designed to combat people who hide behind [redacted by legal] and [redacted by legal], which gives an avenue for those who are [redacted by legal] online to respond and most importantly, to either tie them up in [redacted by legal] for years and financially [redacted by legal] them or to simply [redacted by legal] them.
Interestingly though, however, is the onus of paying [redacted by legal] could be placed up the [redacted by legal] giants who have, in the Prime Minister’s words, created this whole [redacted by legal] gorilla handjob [redacted by legal] mess.
Speaking to
The Advocate today about the possible repercussions these laws might have on the anonymous people who enjoy calling sitting members of the Coalition Government names such as [redacted by legal], [redacted by legal], [redacted by legal], [redacted by legal], [redacted by legal], [redacted by legal], [redacted by legal] and handsome thoughtful guy who has a great relationship with his mother, lawyer Glenn Taylor said it will usher in a new era of online accountability.
“It’s true,” he said.
“You can’t just keep going around saying [redacted by legal] is a [redacted by legal] because [redacted by legal] will take you to court and even if they don’t win, you’ll probably end up [redacted by legal] yourself.
“We obviously don’t need a Federal Corruption Watchdog, these laws will do the same job. Nor do we need any tangible action on climate change. These laws make it illegal to anonymously call [redacted by legal] and mouth-breathing [redacted by legal], which is the same thing”
“It should be pretty [redacted by legal] if you ask me.”
The Advocate reached out to the Office of the Prime Minister for comment but only received an outdated version of the 2004 Mydoom computer worm in reply.
