mmx is in trouble, page-15

Hi Gardie
I would like to thank posters like yourself and glyna for bringing as many facts and opinions to this forum as they have.

But i would have to say i believe your stretching things a little if you want us to believe that even if individuals did get shares in CHM then sell them then buy nicu shares that that gives CHM any claim over what they invested in. That imo would only give claim over the individuals involved not the coy they invsted in.

And if CHM bought worthless leases from nicu even if nicu did profit, how is that nicu's fault. Just poor management by CHM.

The only money that i can see you have actually proven are the two cheques. Unless mmx's legal team can prove that money did flow backwards and forwards from nicu to CHM (wich obviously they can't or they would of already).

SO i don't believe even if CHM are awarded anything that it will be anything near 12%, and for your valuation of Jack hill how can its current value be 3 billion dollars if mmx's market cap is only 700 million.

I wish CHM the best of luck in pursuing Barnes and Grimaldi they deserve all they get, but i can't see them getting much more then the 20 or 30 million sugested by glyna.