''Has there been criticisms of those experiments?''''If so, what are they?''You ignore the implications, you argue for free will regardless of information that shows that it is not will, yet alone free will, that drives decision making or response.
You assert free will regardless of all information to the contrary, brain conditions, chemical imbalances, etc, which has nothing to do with will, free or otherwise, as the agency of human behaviour. The brain is the sole agency, will being a product of information processing.
''Where have I stated such?''It's an inseparable part of your response and assertions. Your spirit dimension and inexplicable free will.
''Neuroscience and brain function that does not prove without doubt that free will exists or doesn't exist.''Neuroscience supports brain agency, not free will as the driver of the brain.
You are asserting free will regardless of evidence that supports brain agency, that it is the state of the brain, not free will, that determines behavioral output.
For example;
Cognition:''When it comes to the human brain, even the simplest of acts can be counter-intuitive and deceptively complicated. For example, try stretching your arm.
Nerves in the limb send messages back to your brain, but the subjective experience you have of stretching isn't due to these signals. The feeling that you willed your arm into motion, and the realisation that you moved it at all, are both the result of an area at the back of your brain called the posterior parietal cortex.
This region helped to produce the intention to move, and predicted what the movement would feel like, all before you twitched a single muscle.
Michel Desmurget and a team of French neuroscientists arrived at this conclusion by stimulating the brains of seven people with electrodes, while they underwent brain surgery under local anaesthetic.
When Desmurget stimulated the parietal cortex, the patients felt a strong desire to move their arms, hands, feet or lips, although they never actually did. Stronger currents cast a powerful illusion, convincing the patients that they had actually moved, even though recordings of electrical activity in their muscles said otherwise.
''You reject the criticisms of the experiments offered on neuroscience and brain function.''What criticisms? I haven't seen anything notable. Plenty of hand waving, that's all.
What do you have, Gum?
