2021 BRN Discussion, page-31153

Morning all,

Just going over the video that @Cozza05 posted yesterday for a second time.

One thing stood out to me more than anything else when they were talking about commercialisation and IP agreements -

Rob at the 9.50min mark says - "Not saying we're in phones but, if you think of a phone as a board behind all the glass and everything, AKIDA would just be another processor in that system, per say.............."

I've been thinking about the psychology behind the answer, and maybe I'm reading into it too much............BUT, Rob obviously felt compelled to clarify we aren't definitely in phones............why?

Possible reasons -

1. He is wary of misleading investors and giving them false hope (which is fair enough and possible)

OR

2. We have possibly already had discussions with an EAP about being in phones, and it is late stages enough for Rob to feel uneasy about giving too much away (possibly due to an NDA)...................... ALSO - He didn't say, "Not saying we're going to be in phones"

HE SAID "Not saying we're in phones"

It's only one possibility, but it is a good possibility imo as this is not the first podcast where mobile phones have been used as an example, in fact, it's one of the most commonly used use case examples by the company................