Got me wondering TR why we are debating someone who is no longer in Drillsearch when really we should discuss someone who is.
On the strength of his reputation you would be hard pressed to believe anything in the Drillsearch statement of claim. A claimed liar he has not sought to defend himself or seek remedy in the courts. We are talking of-course about the excuse of a chairman.
With that question-mark hanging un-answered over his head I would imagine Drillsearch has trouble in the credibility stakes.:)
All these attacks on Simpson is just a way of deflecting attention away from the chairman......err, chairperson.:)
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?