More articles, page-20

I honestly don't think I have seen such a continous attack from one reporter on a mid-sized company, with regurgitated innuendo and half facts to support hyperbolic inferences. Don't understand how The Australian thinks it is news worthy with largely unconfirmed and unsupported sources, that seem largely repeated for one episode to the next. Trying to creating a drama series while a proper investigative process is occurring. Just wait David.

The reporter seems to be is trying to shape the outcome, shaking the tree hard. Weird gaze and hat, needs to dial it back a bit, seems obsessive. Weird series of articles.

Truth will out.