Getting back to the topic of this thread: The impled Price Earnings of the new issue, & the potential for the price on opening to be above the issue price. Here is my amended analysis. Would anyone like to suggest how this could be improved on.
Voice of Reason, I sourced the EBITDA figure from page 39 of the prospectus. The comparable price earnings ratio of 12 I sourced that from Comsec where that figure is quoted for the Transport sector. But maybe it would have been more correct to compare to the Utilities sector PE which is the sector where Comsec places BBI.It’s PE according to Comsec is 14.
Implant you are right to highlight the importance of the exchange rate. Footnote (1) on page 39 states that the $637M EBITDA is based on an AUD:USD of .8187. It has moved up 12% since then, and could even move another 12% next year.
$M
Equity/Price 1786
Debt 3762
Assets 5548
EBIT 637
Deduct Currency impact 80
EBIT after Currency adj 557
Interest & Tax 367
NPAT/Earnings 190
Price/Earnings Ratio 9.4 11.44(Transport)14(Util)
Increase in price on opening exluding reduction for higher exchange rate next year & remaining high gearing.
11.44/9.4-1 22%
Less adj of 10% for exchange rate increase, higher debt & other factor
Increase on opening 9%
Would anyone like to comment on this analysis.
Seahawk
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BBI
- implied pe ratio of new company on issue
implied pe ratio of new company on issue, page-16
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BBI (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online