AKE 0.00% $9.83 allkem limited

Ann: James Bay Feasibility Study Presentation, page-26

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 14,148 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 8600
    Let's do some back-of the-envelope stuff for JB with some round numbers, just for sh!ts and giggles...

    Firstly, let's consider a valuation methodology that incorporates a P/E model in combo with an NPV model...
    Each method has pros and cons, happy for others to elaborate.

    ...so, for the sake of some scribbles, let's just examine a combo that is 50% P/E and 50% NPV based...
    Actually, let's just ignore the NPV half for now, and just examine the 50% P/E portion.

    Simple round numbers scenario:
    300ktpa
    USD$1000/t margin (DYOR and sensitivity analysis, this is just a starting point)
    (assume margin = EBITDA /t for the sake of the estimate)

    Once ramped (2025?), earnings = circa USD$300M pa.
    SOI = 640M
    E = USD$300M / 640M shares = USD$0.47 per share
    50% = USD$0.23 per share
    = AUD$0.33 per share
    For a P/E of 10, P = AUD$3.30 per share
    P/E of 15, P = AUD$4.95 per share
    P/E of 20, P = AUD$6.60 per share

    This suggests that JB might be considered to add several dollars to the share price, assuming it is not/minimally factored in already.... of course this "should" evolve (be added) over time, with continued development and de-risking of the project.
    Is this reasonable? You decide.
    One may argue that this is too much, considering the NPV of the project.
    Others may argue that a P/E method is relevant because it factors future growth beyond the "defined project", enabled by significant future earnings and opportunities that this creates for the company...
    The combo method considers a bit of both.... and note I have only considered one "half" of the combo as noted above...

    hmmmmm... interesting.
    IIRC at least one of the analysts used a similar method (P/E NPV combo) in their model for GXY a little while back..anyone recall or have info handy?

    In any case, it should be rather "significant" at least, imo, especially if there is tangible progress towards a 2024 commissioning!
    And don't forget the relative simplicity compared to Li brine (even if the environment is a bit tough i.e. cold!) - this is literally dig, crush, DMS etc; not some highly complex specialty chemical processing wizardry.

    Thoughts..?

 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add AKE (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.