What you wrote is exclusionary against a certain group of people, i.e. directors.
Just replace the word "directors" with any other group of people, and you will understand why it is exclusionary what you wrote.
If you had put "women" e.g. instead of "directors", your message would've been:
"Further supports my opinion that women should not be tweeting/posting on social media”.
Do you understand why what you wrote is exclusionary against a certain group of people?
Directors are also humans like you. They should be able to post on social media. They should obey the laws, and they should comply with the rules of the specific medium, but provided all the above is true, it is exclusionary to say that they should not be tweeting/posting on social media.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LKE
- LKE towards TOP-5
LKE towards TOP-5, page-54
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24,088 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
IGO
IGO kicks off earn-in copper drilling on-site Encounter's Yeneena play as it adopts new identity
MND
Monadelphous inks $200M contract with Woodside to help build Pluto LNG – but will it make Scarborough cheaper?
Add LKE (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
3.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $60.06M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
3.6¢ | 3.7¢ | 3.5¢ | $100.0K | 2.770M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 772772 | 3.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.7¢ | 655259 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 772772 | 0.036 |
37 | 2291526 | 0.035 |
13 | 1113716 | 0.034 |
11 | 1190047 | 0.033 |
9 | 959544 | 0.032 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.037 | 655259 | 1 |
0.038 | 639547 | 10 |
0.039 | 2063158 | 12 |
0.040 | 1041029 | 18 |
0.041 | 1749539 | 8 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LKE (ASX) Chart |