The competition, page-43

Yes, I agree with that except the part where you thought that I was doxxing you and then congratulated me on not being "one of them" as if it's a special trait of mine to not stalk individuals. If you really are being staked and not just being paranoid, it's probably just 1 person; most people don't bother looking deeply into others' backgrounds across various platforms. That takes a special kind of dedication and personality.

How is that wrong? External approval is next to irrelevant, especially when the origin is China. It's the job of the local authorities to verify and approve external tests for local use.

Clearly, that didn't happen, or we wouldn't have the shocking data from real-world performance verifying that most of those approved tests are rubbish.

Feel free to question anything you want here. People will have opposing opinions though. That's life, handle it. As I've shown you earlier in the thread, I've been accused of being "unbelievably harsh" on the company in the past. In fact, just 1 or 2 days ago, I was accused of being "malicious". Here is the post: https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/geoff-cumming.6515192/?post_id=58604989 Yet now, you're bashing my ear about not being able to speak in a negative manner about the company. Aren't we on the same page? I offer critical opinions, you offer critical opinions, others offer alternate viewpoints.

There are a lot of 'happy clappers' as they've come to be known here. And that's probably largely due to their inexperience, immaturity and emotional investment into the stock that they want to succeed, rather than taking a realistic viewpoint. Look at TSLA. Does it make sense? Not by any sane metric. Yet the price is through the roof and then some. Your job is to capitalise on the state of the markets. It really doesn't matter what anyone else's opinion is. Put money in, take money out. If you don't believe that ADO has any more upside, why are you still here with a 'buy' sentiment commenting about how negativity is not allowed?

"So you're going to assume that ADO price is what's influenced the TGA.

OK! Sounds good! Run with that then,, anything but hold this company to account.

Blame the TGA.

Gee I love it in here. It's great for double speak, mind control not to mention, the thought police."

I simply don't understand this take. I fail to see what the stock price has to do with regulation or how I apparently insinuated as such. I just finished posting a criticism about the Thai landscape and how a shopping mall and as well as electronics companies can distribute subpar tests to 7-11, yet we have no approval as of yet after so many months.

So my sentiment is 'hold' (as it has been recently) until I see evidence of change.