Any other RAT, reader-based or not, can be administered by trained personnel and results reported to government and tested person. So these features don't distinguish Eugeni imho. It'll come down to accuracy, price, ability to supply, reputation for quality, complexity of administering the test (ie level of training required for clinical personnel), and systems compatibility. In AUS there is the home turf advantage, but not abroad where the bigger markets are.
Ann: TGA Registration Update, page-1462
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 956 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
