podium, page-37

Amazed,

Over 6months ago now, i made some phone calls to the relevent government departments and emailed the appropriate minister on the issue of why ESIs coldry was not being supported, given that if it was implemented, Australia would slash its poor emissions record.
All that was required was an immediate commitment on a proven project for immediate results and positive returns.
I spruiked much about Australia becoming a world leader and how disappointing it would be to lose Coldry to an overseas competitor (hopefully not a competitor of our govt.) and asked for a prompt reply so i could research it further.

No reply.
I very rarely dont get a reply and normally there is a legal obligation behind it.
From this, i have concluded that there is a chance that something is in the wiond that i was not able to be spoken to about, by the govt office and which was not able to be put into writing for legal reasons. All assumption...but it is infornmed with circumstance and dot to dot happens.
So call it a long draw of an oversized bow if you like, because it is somewhat.
But dont disclude that there is also a possibility of it being the correct assumption and dont deny the chance that our government may be closer to gas and coal advances than you think, especially on the Eastern seaboard.

Cheers

L