I can’t understand the problem when all I am doing is discussing the company
It appears the Mulga Rock project feasibility “refresh” has some glaring flaws as follows
AUD/USD exchange rate of 65 cent used - which is very optimistic with 10 year futures at 72 cents and current exchange rate at 72 cents
Capital costs reduced 20% by using fit for purpose mining equipment - using second hand equipment will require further capital expenditure in the near future
the contractor providing the second hand equipment then operates the equipment on a “cost plus basis” - this leaves the door wide open for further cost blow outs
there has been no provision for mine closure and rehabilitation costs - which are likely to be considered
Vimy needs long term contracts at the US$100 lb to make this project work which they won’t get imo
bankers will rip the feasibility refresh apart and then walk away
that leaves the utilities to fund the project, and utilities are not stupid, they would know full well Vimy can’t get the funding without them - and will expect a huge trade off via a low off take price in return
there are much better projects out there than Vimys which are also fully permitted and in much better jurisdictions imo
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- VMY
- VMY undervalued
VMY undervalued, page-312
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 41 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)