Ann: Update on South Australian UCG Program , page-16

I can't see the move or establishment as too bad a move.
1.In an area in SA that will have minimal effect should subsidence be an issue.
2. Distancing it from overlapping tenancies.
3. Power generated and supplied to the populated area of SA.
4. Fuel produced within a distribution area, let’s say, middle of Australia to all ports.
5. No other competition or interfering influence in the area.
6. A State Government that is not procrastinating over who or what should preside as the main energy source.

PB wants and needs this project to progress in the not too distant future, for his plans and share holders benefits. Looking forward to seeing his plans come to fruition.