Govt reframes Djokovic Case, page-6

First 6 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Hairyback

46,400 Posts.

15/01/22

09:52

Post #: 58884329
Share

Originally posted by poyndexter ↑

An excerpt from a new article in The Australian … the new grounds seem vindictive and will only serve to make Djokovic a mater to the anti-vax movement if he is deported … this is going to get ugly imo …

[[[The Australian government says the presence of Novak Djokovic throughout the two weeks of the Australian Open may put lives and civil order at risk by increasing anti-vax sentiment and disregard for COVID-19 rules.

In a radical reframing of the case against the Serbian tennis star, Immigration Minister Alex Hawke concedes the unvaccinated Djokovic entered Australia with a valid medical exemption and poses a low risk of contracting the virus while in Australia and passing it on to others due to his recent infection.Novak

The furious debate that had engulfed Djokovic for the past 10 days – whether a recent bout of COVID-19 provided him with a genuine exemption to travel to Australia without being vaccinated – has been abandoned by the government without Mr Hawke even reading Djokovic’s extensive submissions on the question.

Instead, the case is now headed to the Federal Court and will be argued on dramatically new grounds at a public hearing before Justice David O’Callaghan at 10.15am Saturday.]]]

Dex

Expand

"The government is arguing in court that Novak Djokovic should be deported from Australia as “he may risk lives and civil order by eroding regard for Covid rules and vaccinations”.

NOT that he’s a threat to spread the virus.

That he’ll spread dissent.

ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION?"
49 Upvote

Reply