Unlike some, I don't usually dismiss things without investigation. This court decision, if nothing else, is an interesting read. Whether it can be used in future court cases in matters of ownership of genetically modified organisms is another matter. This is not to say that precedents set now may not have unseen implications in the future.
And while I have your attention, how about addressing the increase in all cause mortality for the vaxxed in the UK compared to the unvaxxed. There appears to be over twice the mortality rate for the vaxxed. How can this be reconciled with the 'safe' claim in the 'safe and effective' mantra we have heard ad nauseum for the past two years? Your thoughts?
