So, if they can't decide on an aggressive target to avert the so called catastrophic events predicted by so many AGW alarmists, what are we to do? Just hope the problem will go away by having more and more meetings to raise more alarming forecasts? I suspect the 1.1 metre sea level rise that Wong is so alarmed about isn't enough to scare us all into action. How about stating it will be 11 metres? Surely there must be some scientist out there who can provide sufficient "evidence" this is possible. This is gone beyond a joke. It's a farce.
- Forums
- General
- apec rejects carbon reduction targets
apec rejects carbon reduction targets, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)