Buldania results, page-114

So, you couldn’t find any instance in publications of LGES making any mention of the ‘offtake’?

i’m sure there’s 50+ people here, good people, fomenting for evidence LGES see the ‘offtake’ as material as LTR did or does.

Therefore it is more effective 50+ people who hold find out why LGES have not published at least in same week LTR announced.

Why LTR so loud but not LGES, not even a little news headline on it’s website among 50 other events

i would have thought as supremely intelligent shareholders you’d fully check out statements from both parties.

As I said, outside of China, the other example with KDR and Mitsui reveals different standards of materiality, who is right and who is wrong only time will tell but it’s not a good start for Investment eyes to only see one party announcing the ‘offtake’