good reflection. it's possibly the mgmt shares that will cost. so does this mean an acquiring entity can hoover up as much as possible from the open market at say 20c to build a position and then have to pay a premium for mgmt shares? would this include any stubborn holders (ie me) which would sell at the same premium as mgmt and effectively be tied to the same future performance goals (earn out). does that mean lowly punters like us could get bound to some future promise that would likely be missed?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LVT
- Happy new year. Out with the old and in with the new.
Happy new year. Out with the old and in with the new., page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 59 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
TG1
TechGen Metals kicks off airborne geophys survey at Sally Downs copper play – a first for the permit
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales
Add LVT (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $6.474M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
LVT (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable