Rumours of Takeover., page-105

just remember hwga that the builds to date, to my understanding, have been designed with manual bricklaying in mind. It is possible that some of the so called “sloppy” work is a bi-product if fbr having to adapt to the manual bricklaying design. They have said in past videos that for robotic optimised designs, they would have done things differently. Additionally, some of the so called “sloppy” work could be due to blocks manufactured outside of sizing tolerances. Fbr may very well lay with mm accuracy but it may be having to adapt to non symmetric blocks. This is where closer collaboration with block manufacturers will pay dividends. We don’t know because it’s unlikely fbr would shit can their partner block manufacturers publicly. Not while they are working with them to try resolve these issues in a genuine partnership.

Additionally, the hx is a ever improving piece if tech and laying accuracy should improve over time. With design changes and robotic optimised designs. We certainly appear to have an early entrance into this market ahead of competing manufacturers. Additionally, its possible that the hx1 will offer up improvements in laying accuracy.

I agree that fbr aren’t perfect. I believe that the 3.8c share price offers me a reasonable enough margin of safety to compensate me for the risks. not saying that this is the same for everyone as everyone’s financial abs personal circumstances are different.

I do believe though that the pivacs have a lot at steak abs want fbr to be a success as much if not more than the rest of us. Everyone should make their own rescissions re investing and beware of the so called “white knights” on here trying to save investors from making a bad investment in fbr out of the goodness if they’re hearts.

not providing financial advice. Do your own research, etc etc…