Redbank - The next Copper Giant!, page-16

I've always felt like mgt aren't interested in trickling out updates from the quality of new information they provide when they do release something. This might've been due to Mike wearing multiple hats all last year and with a focus of the exploration side of things it wasn't prioritised. Lets wait and see what Thomas's approach is.

We have soil samplings as well as assays and probably more modelling and detailed descriptions of the geological processes and what it all means for us. This information is very important for the company and it will shape what we do next. It could also be useful in attracting a big partner.

The silence is frustrating for sure, Ive never waited so long for assays. It could also be our worst case predications. We could be getting excited for nothing and the IP readouts were due to something other than mineralisation. Many have come before us and left without a prize, its hard to be sure and always risky business.

This truly is frontier exploration and not just drilling the extentions of historic pits. The advantage we have now is the increased knowledge of SSCs and technology which has been proven to be very reliable in the right conditions and which wasnt available in the previous decades. We know all this already.

I think, and Im happy to be corrected, what we want to see is like in that Bluff Breccia cross section where the higher grade was deeper. That fits with the theory presented in much of the research Ive read. We dont necessarily need those big wide intercepts- I think breccia pipe structure will provide the most important information.. is that what others will be looking for?