Ann: Retraction of Annual General Meeting 2021 Presentation, page-78

Cazz69 the post that was removed clearly stated it was the slide they had to retract...Hence it was the subject of retraction so how can one discuss when the details can not be known...Obviously, the facts have made it harder for unfunded projects to be funded with the facts being known... It was on topic and worthy of further discussion...Non-holders did not appreciate the spotlight on the facts...

Holders need to know what was retracted and more importantly...Spid81 pointed out it was retracted because the slide failed to name the peer companies in the peer comparison slide...It's not that it was not factual it was just that it did not name the peers that have fallen so far behind...Made them all look bad...

That was not appropriate IMO...There are some good projects left without downstream masking deficiency...

Somehow spid81 knew that the details of names were missing as per his comments this morning while no one else knew this...He denies that he reported it...

Lindi is building a mine with a fully funded pathway...The letter of commitment for drawdown is all that is required...They will expend equity first before committing to drawdown...The 12 month grace period kicks in from day one of the first drawdown...





The money is moving from the unfunded to funded projects...First mover advantage

Regards Croc