Why? If the performance of Talnode-C matches or out does that of synthetic (which is what has been presented), why wouldn't you charge top dollar? Add on the benefits of low emissions, world's cleanest etc. and you have a very desirable asset. Companies will avoid carbon tax, shipping cost and can also run good PR by utilizing the "world's greenest anode".
It doesn't matter if the source is natural or synthetic, it is the performance that counts. Don't bother going into copy and paste mode on Talnode performance either, thanks.
The great GREEN mining future - Sweden, page-50
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add TLG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
43.0¢ |
Change
0.020(4.88%) |
Mkt cap ! $163.4M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 40.0¢ | 43.0¢ | 39.5¢ | $681.5K | 1.664M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52873 | 42.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 43.0¢ | 47134 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 07/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| TLG (ASX) Chart |