I am aware (as i am sure other engaged holders are) that one of the minority holders has engaged a partner in Madgewick and Madgewick whose interest is in oppression of shareholders by companies.
Given the frequent call to legal action by minority holders is there a reason why we should not be supporting this effort financially if this lawyer has the credentials
What do other holders think--Some of you who have been here for years and have opinions i respect
P.S- for one to start with
Quality of Our Board, page-19
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RHK (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
74.0¢ |
Change
-0.020(2.63%) |
Mkt cap ! $147.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 76.5¢ | 76.5¢ | 74.0¢ | $5.418K | 7.246K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1300 | 74.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 78.5¢ | 7142 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.35am 07/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RHK (ASX) Chart |