Its interesting RNU have a different opinion to the process being novel and inventive.
I know Topo thought this was the case due to feedback provided by the international examiner, EGR then provided more information where 25 processes were able to secure a patent,
One had to wonder why RNU would blow shareholders funds objecting to a patent if it has no impact on its own purification process,
It also concerning the only 2 companies in the world who objected to the patent is RNU and its consultants Dorfner. I wonder why RNU didn't disclose its own consultancy firm was the other party who objected, I guess you can form your own opinion, I believe it is to do with RNU purification process following a similar path as EGR's patent and both companies need to protect RNU interest.
I am glad you spent all weekend looking into Uribx. you might need to find another purification process if EGR is successful with its application.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RNU
- Ann: Siviour Battery Anode Material Project - Project Update
Ann: Siviour Battery Anode Material Project - Project Update, page-7
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 320 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RNU (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
8.9¢ |
Change
0.005(5.95%) |
Mkt cap ! $226.1M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
8.5¢ | 8.9¢ | 8.4¢ | $429.9K | 4.933M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1000 | 8.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
8.9¢ | 611859 | 6 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 1000 | 0.086 |
4 | 332865 | 0.085 |
6 | 332260 | 0.084 |
2 | 212100 | 0.083 |
5 | 150734 | 0.082 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.089 | 561859 | 5 |
0.090 | 466061 | 9 |
0.091 | 152694 | 5 |
0.094 | 68647 | 2 |
0.095 | 175000 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 21/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RNU (ASX) Chart |