Ann: Siviour Battery Anode Material Project - Project Update, page-7

Its interesting RNU have a different opinion to the process being novel and inventive.

I know Topo thought this was the case due to feedback provided by the international examiner, EGR then provided more information where 25 processes were able to secure a patent,

One had to wonder why RNU would blow shareholders funds objecting to a patent if it has no impact on its own purification process,
It also concerning the only 2 companies in the world who objected to the patent is RNU and its consultants Dorfner. I wonder why RNU didn't disclose its own consultancy firm was the other party who objected, I guess you can form your own opinion, I believe it is to do with RNU purification process following a similar path as EGR's patent and both companies need to protect RNU interest.

I am glad you spent all weekend looking into Uribx. you might need to find another purification process if EGR is successful with its application.