"I would expect that the data is averaged from as many diverse sources as possible. Whenever you take an average there will be individual results that buck the trend and Darwin may well fit into this category but there will also be places that exceed the trend. The average will even these anomolies out. "
You may expect that but how can you trust these figures now that we know they have been cooking the books? Latest to come under suspicion is the Russian data.
"There was a sharp increase in the 3 decades following 1910 but those increases have continued in every decade since with the exception of the 1950s. Indeed the upward trend throughout the whole of last century is clearly visible as is the fact that it is accelerating. "
There is nothing that we know for sure now. We have to go back to square one after what these clowns at at the CRU have done.
You must be very brave to try to defend this rubbish.
