SDL v ANS [2022] WASC 108, page-24

Moving forward...

28 April 2016 Quarterly Update.

Finalising an EPC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction) contractor for port & rail.

Let's think about this for a moment.
The feasibility study IP must have been provided to the EPC contractor so they could assess and consider whether they would participate in the project.

Not unreasonable, and fully expected, yes??




This predates any ANS involvement by two years.


7 February 2018, and we know that two Chinese companies are intimately involved with the technicalities of the project already.




And what does the world [already] know about China and their regard for IP belonging to others?

This still predates any involvement with ANS.

Six months later, and we (ANS) now become involved.




If any theft or misuse of IP occurred, it was well before ANS were involved.

Meanwhile, blood sucking lawyers will drag this out for as long as they can.