lpd share price, page-13978

@TechWreck

You admit that the first comment wasnt correct. Id wouldnt just serve the purpose of lpd but also potential holders who may do background checks on management and other staff. I didnt state they were required by law or by ASX listing reqs. You will have to take that up with whoever made said statement about their source. Fair enough with your final opinion point, I havent really seen any significant uplift. A pip imo isnt a big rise and wouldnt be considered a result of these announcements IMHO.

In regards to cheeky jibe. Most lpd holders would agree but im not sure how it has been delayed. Finance was always going to take some time being sourced from US as a very very cheap form of debt. As many would have anticipated with such sources would be hoops with which we need to jump through to be eligible. Financing like many aspects always has "forcasted, expected, targeted" parameters so unless its within managements control and due to mismanagement, I mean you could call them delays but not really within our control. IE albeit a delay but outside company control and therefore not really companies fault not a delay from our company not a delay IMO haha. Anyone who invests in start ups who doesnt expect delays shouldnt really invest in them as you can almost always be certain to happen.

However, continued delays due to neglect of document lodgements or missing information, bungled information supplied etc. and ASX suspension from being a potato and not keeping up to date with reqs. Sure thats a ball drop. But a "delay" from waiting on US DFC due to say Namibian government meetings due to staff being away or in shortage from covid and therefore moved to a future date. Common man!

Yes, Joe Walsh please put your hand up and take the blame!!!