Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Another reason we need an ICAC, page-38

First 38 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
eagle888

46,202 Posts.

3

07/05/22

00:09

Post #: 61261409
Share

Originally posted by Cowboyinvestor: ↑

yes. I’ve been involved in paying out numerous employees. I would say she has been moved on, on the basis of the public scrutiny over the affair. To do so she would have been remunerated for her losses, and perspective future losses based on her role, income, entitlements and likely career path.

If she hasn’t done anything wrong, she can’t simply be terminated for the sake of it. And that is when an employment payout is used.

Like I said. If she wants to disclose it, she should reimburse the funds.

Expand

Given she is happy for disclosure why won't the govt authorise disclosure.

Hiding behind a secrecy clause in such a circumstance makes it look very fishy.

What is being covered up?
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

DRO

History repeats for DroneShield investors but carnage so far subdued

HotCopper Highlights: Trigg; Droneshield; Lumos & more

SER

Strategic Energy extends its QLD copper-gold frontier with Diamantina acquisition

PSC

Prospect's Mumbezhi Project puts it at the middle of copper's megatrend. And FQM just bought in

BDM

Burgundy plunges -20% after turning to layoffs to navigate record-low diamond prices

SYR

Syrah jumps +19% as graphite tariff threat spurs optimism down under

Week 29 Wrap: ASX hits new all time high of 8,766pts ahead of Aug 1

AII

A new NASDAQ listing for a key player in the global critical minerals space

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

STN

Saturn brings up seventh straight Apollo Hill upgrade on 'impressive' 300-hole drill run

First 38 Last