Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Another reason we need an ICAC, page-38

First 38 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
eagle888

46,202 Posts.

3

07/05/22

00:09

Post #: 61261409
Share

Originally posted by Cowboyinvestor: ↑

yes. I’ve been involved in paying out numerous employees. I would say she has been moved on, on the basis of the public scrutiny over the affair. To do so she would have been remunerated for her losses, and perspective future losses based on her role, income, entitlements and likely career path.

If she hasn’t done anything wrong, she can’t simply be terminated for the sake of it. And that is when an employment payout is used.

Like I said. If she wants to disclose it, she should reimburse the funds.

Expand

Given she is happy for disclosure why won't the govt authorise disclosure.

Hiding behind a secrecy clause in such a circumstance makes it look very fishy.

What is being covered up?
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

AHN

Athena, Fenix, and Warradarge come together for Mid West Green Iron triumvirate

TMG

Trigg up +10% on antimony target boost; fieldwork kicks off

S32

South32 flags higher Mozal costs as site's electricity supply remains 'uncertain'

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

First 38 Last

SPONSORED BY