Share
10,488 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 5453
clock Created with Sketch.
11/05/22
12:47
Share
Originally posted by theghostwithin:
↑
It appears this is a fact hidden in many years of ownership that some of the newer holders are unaware of. Like anything, when you have a legal obligation to offer someone else the right to purchase you must offer that person the right under the previously agreed terms before you can even hold formal discussions of sale with someone else - failure to do so is breach of contract, undertaking of meetings with the new buyer is conspiracy to commit fraud, sale of the asset is fraud. Full payment should be returned to Zin Chen Ming Co Ltd, AVZ should be required to purchase the asset in full at the price it was sold to Zin Chen Ming Co Ltd, and those who had to sign off on the illegal sale of assets should be prosecuted under whichever laws the DRC feel best suit the situation. Based on what has been described for more than 3 years, the 15% is ours to refuse, before anyone has the right to discuss purchase of. There are no exceptions. If this is not the case, AVZ have been disingenuous with its' shareholders and I personally do not believe that to be the case. No up ramping, down ramping, just facts in the timeline of AVZ.
Expand
You're applying western legal principles to a third world country.