That's not correct. The agreement is for "life-of-mine operations" but because it allows them to divert any quantity they like to their own refinery and that refinery is currently planned for 2025 what they have done in the PFS is use that year to revert back to market rate forecasts for the full production. That is probably a reasonable thing to do in the study but can also be a bit misleading. What if that refinery isn't done by 2027? Also as I highlighted depending which figure 60,000 or 113,000 is actually correct makes a huge difference with a 163,000/yr production rate.
I don't hold PLL for anyone thinking I have bias either way.
Ann: PLL:Piedmont Partner SYA Announces Positive PFS for NAL Mine, page-16
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SYA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.3¢ |
Change
-0.002(5.71%) |
Mkt cap ! $339.6M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.5¢ | 3.6¢ | 3.3¢ | $1.707M | 49.50M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 41 | 9042151 | 3.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4¢ | 1735970 | 10 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 01/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYA (ASX) Chart |