Ann: Trading Halt, page-404

"Pity you cant even put a value on ONE of these as you said... how funny"

Actually mate I have answered this on multiple occasions now today, perhaps you should go back and absorb the information that has been provided to you, rather than being oblivious to the answers presented to you.

#1-2 on your list has been answered by the company this week when they released a Joint Authier Feed + NAL PFS. Whilst I have pointed out the glaring errors and overly optimistic assumptions that Sayona have made in this document, it resulted in a PostTax NPV8 of US$428m for Sayona's 75% Interest in the Projects.

If Sayona utilised more reasonable assumptions with pricing by acknowledging their existing LOM agreement with PLL & if they modelled 4.19Mt over the life of mine instead of 4.4Mt (37.2Mt at 1% Li20 at a 67.7% Recovery equates to 4.19Mt and not 4.4Mt SC6) then the resulting figures would have been more reasonable IMO for what the true combined value of Authier + NAL is, IMO the current Combined NPV of US$428m is inflated

#3-7 on your list is a mix of tenements that are in early stages of exploration. None of the projects have progressed through to feasibility stages as of yet and so their value is minimal at this stage

Important to note that both the JORC + NI 43-101 Codes, contain wording along the lines of "Mineral Resources (Drill Results / Block Models) are not Reserves until they have demonstrated economic viability based on a feasibility study or prefeasibility study".

Considering I have again answered another of your questions, seems only fair for you to answer the question I have posed to you ?