I’m just wondering if the board actually sees what politicians and ‘greenies’ are both wanting, but realising it won’t come without cost. So- are AGL moving towards having a dirty 1/2 and a clean 1/2- you CANT HAVE BOTH. Politicians know it’s going to cost going green, and also cost huge transitioning from coal, etc. They also know that like in SA a few years ago- people don’t like not having electricity or being restricted- even when this was caused by enviro conditions. People like ‘Gretchen’ demand change- but realistically it costs big money- and the common person can state we need change- but who pays? AGL having a dirty and clean side solves both long term- gets support from Govts & People- to a degree!?
AGL Price at posting:
$8.87 Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)